In the Barrel

About this Episode

Steve Vladeck rejoins us on the law of civilian-military separation, whether Marbury v. Madison was rightly decided, and how his recent oral argument before the Supreme Court went (spoiler: amazingly but weirdly). (Ignore Christian's use of the term "basises" (wtf?) and other misstatements and inanities ... you try recording ever week between classes....)

This show’s links:

• Steve Vladeck’s faculty profile and academic writing
• The National Security Law Podcast 54: Family Ties or Family Matters?
• First Mondays OT2017 #12: False Idol (guest Steve Vladeck)
• SCOTUSblog page for Dalmazzi v. United States (including links to all the briefs and more)
• The oral argument: Oyez version, SCOTUS downloads, and transcript
• Oral Argument 137: Steve Vladeck Pincer Move (where we discussed Dalmazzi at the cert stage)
• Burns v. Wilson
• Marbury v. Madison
• William Baude, Exciting Developments in Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: Some Would Call It the Second Coming of Marbury v. Madison
• United States v. Coe
• ex parte Bollman and Swartwout
• Akhil Amar, Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
• Louise Weinberg, Our Marbury
• Felker v. Turpin; see also Oral Argument 84: Felker's Chickens
• United States v. Gray